Meta Report · Oct 13 – Oct 19

This report compares two periods: Oct 6 – Oct 19 and Sep 22 – Oct 5. Copy counts combine Main Deck and Sideboard. Where two Performance scores are given, the first is for decks running the card at that count and the second for decks not running it.

Rarely played cards that won or made top cut

The card's Play rate within the Legend is 25% or lower, but between Oct 6 and Oct 19 a deck running it won a tournament, or at least 2 decks running it made top cut and its Top cut play rate is at least twice its Play rate. No minimum Sample.

— Jayce · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 17 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 12%), Top cuts 3, Wins 1 (成都全国公开赛城市赛特别场A, 128 players, Oct 11). All Jayce decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 100%.

— Jayce · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 2 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 1%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (成都全国公开赛城市赛特别场A, 128 players, Oct 11). All Jayce decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 33%.

— Lillia · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 2 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 5%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (成都全国公开赛城市赛特别场B, 128 players, Oct 11). All Lillia decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 2. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 50%.

— Rek'Sai · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 9 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 13%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shanghai · 10.07, 104 players, Oct 7). All Rek'Sai decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 33%.

— Rek'Sai · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 6 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 8%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shanghai · 10.07, 104 players, Oct 7). All Rek'Sai decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 33%.

— Akali · 3 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 1 deck at 3 copies (Play rate 1%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Guangzhou · 10.7, 83 players, Oct 7). All Akali decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 5. Top cut play rate at 3 copies: 20%.

— Kai'Sa · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 4 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 10%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shenzhen · 10.6, 73 players, Oct 6). All Kai'Sa decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 4. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 25%.

— Kai'Sa · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 2 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 5%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shenzhen · 10.6, 73 players, Oct 6). All Kai'Sa decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 4. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 25%.

— Kai'Sa · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 1 deck at 2 copies (Play rate 2%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shenzhen · 10.6, 73 players, Oct 6). All Kai'Sa decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 4. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 25%.

— Irelia · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 34 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 15%), Top cuts 3. All Irelia decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 9. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 33%.

— Rek'Sai · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 8 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 11%), Top cuts 2. All Rek'Sai decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 67%.

— Irelia · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 14 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 6%), Top cuts 2. All Irelia decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 9. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 22%.

— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Sample 3 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 2%), Top cuts 2. All Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 8. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 25%.

Performed well for four weeks, Play rate still under 50%

In both periods, decks running this number of copies had a clearly higher Performance score than decks not running the card. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate is 50% or lower, Top cut play rate is not below Play rate, and at least 2 of these decks made top cut.

— Irelia · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 41% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 45% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 78%, Top cuts 7, Wins 0. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 64.2 / 41.7 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 53.7 / 45.0 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— Irelia · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 44% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 35% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 44%, Top cuts 4, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 60.2 / 39.1 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 56.2 / 44.4 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 16% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 12% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 51.0 / 43.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 69.9 / 36.4 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— Kennen · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 23% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 12% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 59.1 / 44.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 65.4 / 46.7 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— Akali · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 39% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 47% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 60%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 61.0 / 44.8 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 57.8 / 45.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— Ornn · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 44% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 49% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 67%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 58.1 / 42.3 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 53.4 / 45.1 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 19% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 20% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 3, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 57.7 / 49.9 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 59.8 / 47.3 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 32% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 21% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 3, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 51.4 / 40.9 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 57.2 / 45.7 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.

Performed poorly for four weeks, but most decks run it

More than half of the Legend's decks run the card, and in both periods the most common number of copies had a clearly lower Performance score than decks not running the card.

— Irelia · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 39% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 45% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 36.2 / 61.8 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 42.8 / 53.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Vex · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 45% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 44% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 49.4 / 55.1 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 33.7 / 68.2 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Akali · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 56% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 50% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 40%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 38.7 / 60.6 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 43.6 / 55.5 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Kai'Sa · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 53% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 48% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 39.7 / 63.3 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 43.1 / 57.5 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Azir · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 31% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 36% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 41.3 / 53.9 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 41.8 / 59.2 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Irelia · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 58% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 56% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 56%, Top cuts 5, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 44.0 / 56.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 40.1 / 63.6 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Azir · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 27% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 37% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 49.5 / 58.6 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 37.0 / 59.0 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— LeBlanc · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 36% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 42% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 42.9 / 56.9 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 46.5 / 53.4 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Kennen · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 51% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 48% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 46.4 / 51.0 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 42.8 / 56.3 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

— Rengar · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 52% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 61% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 43.0 / 56.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 47.1 / 53.3 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.

High Performance score, but no top cut

Decks running this number of copies have a Performance score at least 8 points higher than decks not running the card, with a Sample of 15 decks or more, but none of them made top cut between Oct 6 and Oct 19 (the Legend had at least 4 top cut decks in that time).

— Azir · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 33% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 33% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 65.5 / 31.1 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 63.3 / 38.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.

— Akali · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 14% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 11% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 59.4 / 49.1 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 62.6 / 45.2 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.

— Akali · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 16% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 21% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 49.7 / 46.0 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 57.8 / 45.6 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.

— Irelia · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 1 copy 7%, Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0; Performance score 57.7, against 45.3 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.

Performed well between Sep 22 and Oct 5, poorly between Oct 6 and Oct 19

— Irelia · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 40% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 56% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 56%, Top cuts 5, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 61.8 / 41.4 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 48.0 / 52.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 16 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 49% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 40% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 58.1 / 42.7 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 43.9 / 55.7 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Vex · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 60% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 64% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 75%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 61.8 / 38.5 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 46.5 / 59.0 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 64% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 80% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 67%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 54.3 / 45.0 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 42.7 / 60.1 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 16 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 19% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 30% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 59.7 / 43.6 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 48.3 / 53.2 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 11 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Fiora · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 27% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 26% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 57.6 / 48.9 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 37.3 / 54.1 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 35% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 38% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 57.4 / 39.3 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 50.4 / 54.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Fiora · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 24% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 21% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 57.7 / 42.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 42.9 / 52.4 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 20% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 30% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 38%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 55.7 / 45.5 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 47.4 / 53.0 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

Performed poorly between Sep 22 and Oct 5, well between Oct 6 and Oct 19

— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 26% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 23% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 43.1 / 59.7 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 59.8 / 46.5 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Fiora · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 25% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 31% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 40.9 / 57.3 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 56.9 / 44.4 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Fiora · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 25% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 20% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 42.0 / 57.1 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 57.8 / 38.8 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Rengar · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 27% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 19% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 42.1 / 54.5 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 61.1 / 40.1 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Irelia · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 46% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 60% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 44%, Top cuts 4, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 46.9 / 55.1 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 52.8 / 47.4 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 14 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 34% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 28% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 42.9 / 56.5 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 55.5 / 49.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Irelia · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 23% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 13% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 11%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 44.9 / 54.8 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 54.5 / 45.5 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Kennen · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 16% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 31% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 43.1 / 53.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 53.0 / 47.1 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 15 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 47% (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 44% (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Oct 6 – Oct 19: Top cut play rate 38%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 44.8 / 57.0 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 49.7 / 38.8 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.

Number of copies: a clear difference for four weeks

— Irelia. Performance score, 1 copy / 2 copies: 48.6 / 36.2 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 53.4 / 42.8 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 30% at 1 copy, 45% at 2 copies. Decks running 1 copy performed better in all four weeks; consider running 1 copy.

— Akali. Performance score, 2 copies / 1 copy: 61.0 / 46.9 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 57.8 / 45.8 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 47% at 2 copies, 34% at 1 copy. Decks running 2 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 2 copies.

— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman. Performance score, 3 copies / 2 copies: 47.5 / 44.8 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 69.9 / 49.7 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 30% at 3 copies, 44% at 2 copies. Decks running 3 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 3 copies.

— Jayce. Performance score, 1 copy / 2 copies: 57.7 / 44.4 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 59.8 / 46.8 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 20% at 1 copy, 27% at 2 copies. Decks running 1 copy performed better in all four weeks; consider running 1 copy.

— Rek'Sai. Performance score, 1 copy / 2 copies: 56.5 / 40.8 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 51.6 / 44.2 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 35% at 1 copy, 35% at 2 copies. Decks running 1 copy performed better in all four weeks; consider running 1 copy.

— LeBlanc. Performance score, 3 copies / 2 copies: 52.9 / 39.4 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 55.8 / 42.3 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 13% at 3 copies, 22% at 2 copies. Decks running 3 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 3 copies.

— Kennen. Performance score, 1 copy / 2 copies: 55.3 / 43.0 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 51.1 / 44.5 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 62% at 1 copy, 23% at 2 copies. Decks running 1 copy performed better in all four weeks; consider running 1 copy.

— Vex. Performance score, 2 copies / 1 copy: 50.3 / 45.4 (Sep 22 – Oct 5), 52.4 / 38.9 (Oct 6 – Oct 19). Play rate (Oct 6 – Oct 19): 34% at 2 copies, 27% at 1 copy. Decks running 2 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 2 copies.

New cards, Oct 6 – Oct 19

Fewer than 10 decks ran these cards between Sep 22 and Oct 5; between Oct 6 and Oct 19 their Play rate rose clearly and they perform well. Listed for reference.

— Kennen · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 1 copy 36%, Top cut play rate 38%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0; Performance score 57.9, against 42.8 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Kha'Zix · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 2 copies 29%, Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0; Performance score 65.6, against 36.4 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Irelia · 3 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 3 copies 10%, Top cut play rate 11%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 65.4, against 47.8 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Azir · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 2 copies 16%, Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 62.5, against 40.9 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Kha'Zix · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 2 copies 31%, Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0; Performance score 62.6, against 38.7 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Fiora · 2 copies. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 2 copies 18%, Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 56.8, against 40.4 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Vex · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 1 copy 19%, Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0; Performance score 59.0, against 42.6 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

— Ornn · 1 copy. Oct 6 – Oct 19: Play rate at 1 copy 28%, Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 58.6, against 45.6 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 22 and Oct 5, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.

By Domain: cards that perform well across several Legends

Three single-Domain cards per Domain. Cards whose decks perform better across several Legends come first (Performance score at least 3 points higher between Oct 6 and Oct 19, and not lower between Sep 22 and Oct 5); the remaining places go by the number of Legends where the card performs better, then by the score difference. Performance score here covers all copy counts together.

Fury

— Fury Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 3. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Rengar (Play rate 17%, Performance score 13.9 points higher); Rek'Sai (Play rate 11%, Performance score 12.5 points higher); Akali (Play rate 89%, Performance score 7.3 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Rek'Sai, Rengar; consider running more copies.

— Fury Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 1. Decks running it perform better in 1 of them: Rek'Sai (Play rate 14%, Performance score 16.6 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Rek'Sai; consider running more copies.

— Fury Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 1. Decks running it perform better in 1 of them: Rek'Sai (Play rate 35%, Performance score 12.0 points higher).

Mind

— Mind Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Kai'Sa (Play rate 24%, Performance score 35.3 points higher); Diana (Play rate 35%, Performance score 11.3 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Diana, Kai'Sa; consider running more copies.

— Mind Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 5. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Jayce (Play rate 86%, Performance score 8.0 points higher); Ezreal (Play rate 45%, Performance score 6.3 points higher); Diana (Play rate 35%, Performance score 4.5 points higher). Not better in: Jhin, LeBlanc. Play rate is still low in: Diana; consider running more copies.

— Mind Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 3. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Ezreal (Play rate 19%, Performance score 18.7 points higher); Jayce (Play rate 88%, Performance score 7.7 points higher). Not better in: Kai'Sa. Play rate is still low in: Ezreal; consider running more copies.

Calm

— Calm Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 8. Decks running it perform better in 4 of them: Akali (Play rate 35%, Performance score 14.2 points higher); Ornn (Play rate 77%, Performance score 12.4 points higher); Master Yi, Wuju Master (Play rate 48%, Performance score 9.3 points higher); Azir (Play rate 47%, Performance score 5.8 points higher). Not better in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman, Irelia, Vex, Lillia.

— Calm Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 8. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Irelia (Play rate 18%, Performance score 15.9 points higher); Vex (Play rate 53%, Performance score 14.3 points higher); Azir (Play rate 15%, Performance score 5.6 points higher). Not better in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman, Akali, Ornn, Lillia, Master Yi, Wuju Master. Play rate is still low in: Azir, Irelia; consider running more copies.

— Calm Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 5. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Lillia (Play rate 43%, Performance score 23.9 points higher); Nasus (Play rate 22%, Performance score 6.8 points higher). Not better in: Irelia, Akali, Ornn. Play rate is still low in: Nasus; consider running more copies.

Body

— Body Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 6. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Fiora (Play rate 29%, Performance score 16.2 points higher); Master Yi, Wuju Master (Play rate 52%, Performance score 7.1 points higher). Not better in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman, Jayce, Kha'Zix, Rengar. Play rate is still low in: Fiora; consider running more copies.

— Body Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 3. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman (Play rate 69%, Performance score 6.1 points higher); Fiora (Play rate 15%, Performance score 4.4 points higher). Not better in: Kha'Zix. Play rate is still low in: Fiora; consider running more copies.

— Body Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 5. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman (Play rate 14%, Performance score 6.6 points higher); Fiora (Play rate 63%, Performance score 3.8 points higher). Not better in: Jayce, Kha'Zix, Master Yi, Wuju Master. Play rate is still low in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman; consider running more copies.

Order

— Order Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Azir (Play rate 29%, Performance score 9.9 points higher); Fiora (Play rate 54%, Performance score 5.7 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Azir; consider running more copies.

— Order Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 4. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Azir (Play rate 14%, Performance score 29.6 points higher); Kennen (Play rate 62%, Performance score 19.4 points higher). Not better in: Rek'Sai, LeBlanc. Play rate is still low in: Azir; consider running more copies.

— Order Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 4. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Fiora (Play rate 42%, Performance score 17.9 points higher); Azir (Play rate 88%, Performance score 8.2 points higher). Not better in: Rek'Sai, LeBlanc.

Chaos

— Chaos Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Kennen (Play rate 84%, Performance score 25.7 points higher); Kha'Zix (Play rate 40%, Performance score 18.0 points higher).

— Chaos Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Kennen (Play rate 7%, Performance score 9.7 points higher); Kha'Zix (Play rate 26%, Performance score 7.0 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Kennen, Kha'Zix; consider running more copies.

— Chaos Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 5. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Kha'Zix (Play rate 60%, Performance score 6.0 points higher); Kennen (Play rate 84%, Performance score 5.9 points higher); Irelia (Play rate 89%, Performance score 3.2 points higher). Not better in: Diana, Ezreal.

Legends

Site data for the last 7 days. Average Conversion rate across all Legends: 0.0%. Meta share = the Legend's decks ÷ all decks; Top cut share = the Legend's top cut finishes ÷ all top cut finishes; Conversion rate = top cut finishes ÷ the Legend's decks.

Legend	Tier	Meta share	Top cut share	Conversion rate	Wins

Tournament winners, Oct 13 – Oct 19

No tournaments with 64 or more players between Oct 13 and Oct 19.