This report compares two periods: Sep 29 – Oct 12 and Sep 15 – Sep 28. Copy counts combine Main Deck and Sideboard. Where two Performance scores are given, the first is for decks running the card at that count and the second for decks not running it.
Rarely played cards that won or made top cut
The card's Play rate within the Legend is 25% or lower, but between Sep 29 and Oct 12 a deck running it won a tournament, or at least 2 decks running it made top cut and its Top cut play rate is at least twice its Play rate. No minimum Sample.
— Jayce · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 25 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 14%), Top cuts 3, Wins 1 (成都全国公开赛 城市赛特别场A, 128 players, Oct 11). All Jayce decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 100%.
— Jayce · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 4 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 2%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (成都全国公开赛 城市赛特别场A, 128 players, Oct 11). All Jayce decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 33%.
— Lillia · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 2 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 4%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (成都全国公开赛 城市赛特别场B, 128 players, Oct 11). All Lillia decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 5. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 20%.
— Fiora · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 9 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 7%), Top cuts 2, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Guangzhou · 10.1, 111 players, Oct 1). All Fiora decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 4. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 50%.
— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 22 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 12%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Chengdu · 10.2, 120 players, Oct 2). All Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 17. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 6%.
— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 5 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 3%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Chengdu · 10.2, 120 players, Oct 2). All Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 17. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 6%.
— Fiora · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 7 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 6%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Guangzhou · 10.1, 111 players, Oct 1). All Fiora decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 4. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 25%.
— Fiora · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 5 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 4%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Guangzhou · 10.1, 111 players, Oct 1). All Fiora decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 4. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 25%.
— Irelia · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 34 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 12%), Top cuts 3, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Harbin · 10.2, 85 players, Oct 2). All Irelia decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 17. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 18%.
— Rek'Sai · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 11 decks at 2 copies (Play rate 12%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shanghai · 10.07, 104 players, Oct 7). All Rek'Sai decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 33%.
— Rek'Sai · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 6 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 7%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (City Challenge · Shanghai · 10.07, 104 players, Oct 7). All Rek'Sai decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 33%.
— Viktor · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 4 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 12%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (京城大师赛, 101 players, Oct 7). All Viktor decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 33%.
— Viktor · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 1 deck at 2 copies (Play rate 3%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (京城大师赛, 101 players, Oct 7). All Viktor decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 2 copies: 33%.
— Viktor · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Sample 4 decks at 1 copy (Play rate 12%), Top cuts 1, Wins 1 (京城大师赛, 101 players, Oct 7). All Viktor decks in the same two weeks: Top cuts 3. Top cut play rate at 1 copy: 33%.
Performed well for four weeks, Play rate still under 50%
In both periods, decks running this number of copies had a clearly higher Performance score than decks not running the card. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate is 50% or lower, Top cut play rate is not below Play rate, and at least 2 of these decks made top cut.
— Kennen · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 21% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 19% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 23%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 64.4 / 39.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 56.9 / 34.7 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Fiora · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 25% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 24% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 2. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 62.8 / 40.0 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 58.6 / 43.5 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Irelia · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 50% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 43% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 59%, Top cuts 10, Wins 1. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 55.6 / 47.7 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 55.0 / 45.5 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Irelia · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 59% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 49% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 65%, Top cuts 11, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 51.8 / 46.7 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 55.0 / 43.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Akali · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 38% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 45% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 67%, Top cuts 6, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 61.2 / 45.1 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.6 / 44.5 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Azir · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 35% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 48% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 67%, Top cuts 4, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 59.4 / 37.9 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 55.7 / 35.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 22% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 31% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 35%, Top cuts 6, Wins 2. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 58.0 / 44.4 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 63.7 / 43.3 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 13% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 13% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 43%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 54.4 / 44.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 65.2 / 36.8 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Viktor · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 40% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 35% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 67%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 63.5 / 39.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 60.2 / 39.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Kennen · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 19% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 15% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 23%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 58.1 / 48.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 63.2 / 46.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Akali · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 11% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 20% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 22%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 54.5 / 49.0 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 61.5 / 44.7 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 25% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 25% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 57%, Top cuts 4, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 53.4 / 43.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 56.1 / 46.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 30% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 24% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 100%, Top cuts 3, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 50.0 / 44.5 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 58.2 / 40.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
— Vex · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 20% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 15% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 60.3 / 47.4 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.3 / 45.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs well in all four weeks; consider running more copies.
Performed poorly for four weeks, but most decks run it
More than half of the Legend's decks run the card, and in both periods the most common number of copies had a clearly lower Performance score than decks not running the card.
— Kai'Sa · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 52% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 51% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 42.6 / 59.9 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 38.0 / 62.7 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Akali · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 59% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 50% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 38.5 / 62.9 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 43.9 / 54.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Irelia · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 27% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 47% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 18%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 46.1 / 56.6 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 42.0 / 54.8 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Vex · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 54% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 50% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 4, Wins 1. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 44.0 / 51.7 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 35.4 / 65.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Irelia · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 64% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 57% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 35%, Top cuts 6, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 45.5 / 57.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 39.8 / 62.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Fiora · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 26% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 46% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 1. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 43.0 / 56.5 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 45.5 / 55.3 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— LeBlanc · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 46% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 38% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 14%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 45.4 / 54.0 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 45.0 / 55.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Azir · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 30% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 35% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 45.0 / 54.3 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 43.5 / 54.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Vex · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 70% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 71% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 38%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 45.3 / 54.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 46.5 / 53.3 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
— Kai'Sa · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 67% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 67% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 83%, Top cuts 5, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 47.6 / 52.1 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 44.2 / 57.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Performs poorly in all four weeks; consider running fewer copies.
High Performance score, but no top cut
Decks running this number of copies have a Performance score at least 8 points higher than decks not running the card, with a Sample of 15 decks or more, but none of them made top cut between Sep 29 and Oct 12 (the Legend had at least 4 top cut decks in that time).
— Fiora · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 14% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 17% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 50.0 / 56.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.7 / 41.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.
— Akali · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 12% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 12% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 42.3 / 50.5 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 58.4 / 44.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.
— LeBlanc · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 13% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 12% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 51.3 / 44.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 50.4 / 36.8 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.
— Akali · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 11% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 13% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 54.4 / 48.0 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 60.2 / 48.8 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.
— Irelia · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 1 copy 7%, Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0; Performance score 56.4, against 46.1 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.
— Vex · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 2 copies 16%, Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0; Performance score 53.5, against 43.4 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. Avg. placement is good, but none of these decks made top cut; not a reason to run more copies.
Performed well between Sep 15 and Sep 28, poorly between Sep 29 and Oct 12
— Kennen · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 49% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 39% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 23%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 57.1 / 44.1 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 37.9 / 59.8 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy fell by 10 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 44% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 63% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 59%, Top cuts 10, Wins 2. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 58.3 / 44.5 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 42.9 / 61.2 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 19 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Akali · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 29% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 29% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 11%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 61.8 / 41.0 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 44.2 / 54.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 42% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 42% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 29%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 58.8 / 44.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 44.8 / 54.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Kennen · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 35% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 50% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 31%, Top cuts 4, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 55.9 / 46.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 39.9 / 57.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 15 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Fiora · 3 copies. Play rate at 3 copies: 64% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 57% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 1. Performance score, 3 copies / not played: 57.6 / 42.7 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 44.8 / 57.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Vex · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 36% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 29% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 12%, Top cuts 1, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 57.0 / 44.0 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 38.7 / 58.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Akali · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 50% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 37% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 44%, Top cuts 4, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 53.8 / 45.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 43.4 / 57.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 2 copies fell by 13 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Vex · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 46% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 66% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 88%, Top cuts 7, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 62.1 / 35.9 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 48.8 / 56.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 20 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
Performed poorly between Sep 15 and Sep 28, well between Sep 29 and Oct 12
— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 22% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 22% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 39.4 / 58.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.6 / 48.3 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Jayce · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 34% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 26% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 1, Wins 1. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 43.7 / 55.3 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.1 / 43.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Irelia · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 40% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 65%, Top cuts 11, Wins 2. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 43.9 / 54.3 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 53.9 / 46.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy rose by 19 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Irelia · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 18% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 15% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 18%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 41.0 / 57.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 53.1 / 46.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Fiora · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 22% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 31% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 40.5 / 57.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 53.9 / 46.8 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— LeBlanc · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 39% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 28% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 43%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 40.3 / 58.9 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 54.2 / 51.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy fell by 11 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Fiora · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 32% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 20% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 41.0 / 56.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 54.3 / 41.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 1 copy fell by 12 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Rengar · 1 copy. Play rate at 1 copy: 21% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 20% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 0%, Top cuts 0, Wins 0. Performance score, 1 copy / not played: 42.9 / 57.9 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 57.3 / 42.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
— Kennen · 2 copies. Play rate at 2 copies: 15% (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 49% (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Sep 29 – Oct 12: Top cut play rate 46%, Top cuts 6, Wins 0. Performance score, 2 copies / not played: 42.4 / 50.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 54.3 / 41.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate at 2 copies rose by 34 percentage points between the two periods. The two periods disagree, so no conclusion yet; we will check again next week.
Number of copies: a clear difference for four weeks
— Akali. Performance score, 2 copies / 1 copy: 61.2 / 46.7 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.6 / 45.6 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 45% at 2 copies, 33% at 1 copy. Decks running 2 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 2 copies.
— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman. Performance score, 3 copies / 2 copies: 58.0 / 50.1 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 63.7 / 47.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 31% at 3 copies, 45% at 2 copies. Decks running 3 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 3 copies.
— Rek'Sai. Performance score, 1 copy / 2 copies: 62.3 / 42.4 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 53.4 / 45.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 38% at 1 copy, 29% at 2 copies. Decks running 1 copy performed better in all four weeks; consider running 1 copy.
— Jayce. Performance score, 2 copies / 1 copy: 53.7 / 38.3 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.3 / 50.4 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 56% at 2 copies, 15% at 1 copy. Decks running 2 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 2 copies.
— Kennen. Performance score, 2 copies / 1 copy: 48.6 / 46.6 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 63.6 / 46.1 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 17% at 2 copies, 21% at 1 copy. Decks running 2 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 2 copies.
— LeBlanc. Performance score, 3 copies / 2 copies: 53.1 / 40.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 55.7 / 43.0 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 12% at 3 copies, 24% at 2 copies. Decks running 3 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 3 copies.
— Fiora. Performance score, 1 copy / 2 copies: 53.7 / 50.2 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 49.6 / 36.9 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 34% at 1 copy, 28% at 2 copies. Decks running 1 copy performed better in all four weeks; consider running 1 copy.
— Vex. Performance score, 2 copies / 1 copy: 60.3 / 50.8 (Sep 15 – Sep 28), 59.3 / 52.3 (Sep 29 – Oct 12). Play rate (Sep 29 – Oct 12): 15% at 2 copies, 65% at 1 copy. Decks running 2 copies performed better in all four weeks; consider running 2 copies.
New cards, Sep 29 – Oct 12
Fewer than 10 decks ran these cards between Sep 15 and Sep 28; between Sep 29 and Oct 12 their Play rate rose clearly and they perform well. Listed for reference.
— Nasus · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 2 copies 38%, Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 69.5, against 35.0 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Kennen · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 1 copy 32%, Top cut play rate 38%, Top cuts 5, Wins 0; Performance score 59.5, against 42.0 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Irelia · 3 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 3 copies 10%, Top cut play rate 12%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0; Performance score 68.3, against 43.5 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 1 copy 17%, Top cut play rate 18%, Top cuts 3, Wins 0; Performance score 61.3, against 44.9 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Nasus · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 1 copy 27%, Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 63.4, against 39.0 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Ornn · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 1 copy 24%, Top cut play rate 33%, Top cuts 1, Wins 0; Performance score 61.6, against 43.1 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Fiora · 1 copy. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 1 copy 20%, Top cut play rate 25%, Top cuts 1, Wins 1; Performance score 56.1, against 40.6 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
— Kha'Zix · 2 copies. Sep 29 – Oct 12: Play rate at 2 copies 26%, Top cut play rate 50%, Top cuts 2, Wins 0; Performance score 62.3, against 41.0 for decks not running the card. Fewer than 10 decks ran it between Sep 15 and Sep 28, so there is no earlier data to compare with. To be reviewed next week.
By Domain: cards that perform well across several Legends
Three single-Domain cards per Domain. Cards whose decks perform better across several Legends come first (Performance score at least 3 points higher between Sep 29 and Oct 12, and not lower between Sep 15 and Sep 28); the remaining places go by the number of Legends where the card performs better, then by the score difference. Performance score here covers all copy counts together.
Fury
— Fury Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 1. Decks running it perform better in 1 of them: Rek'Sai (Play rate 13%, Performance score 16.4 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Rek'Sai; consider running more copies.
— Fury Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 1. Decks running it perform better in 1 of them: Rek'Sai (Play rate 33%, Performance score 12.2 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Rek'Sai; consider running more copies.
— Fury Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 3. Decks running it perform better in 1 of them: Rek'Sai (Play rate 11%, Performance score 10.6 points higher). Not better in: Rengar, Akali. Play rate is still low in: Rek'Sai; consider running more copies.
Mind
— Mind Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 4. Decks running it perform better in 4 of them: Kai'Sa (Play rate 25%, Performance score 33.6 points higher); Mel (Play rate 36%, Performance score 30.0 points higher); Lillia (Play rate 16%, Performance score 19.2 points higher); Diana (Play rate 34%, Performance score 18.1 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Kai'Sa, Diana, Lillia; consider running more copies.
— Mind Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 3. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Diana (Play rate 69%, Performance score 25.6 points higher); Kai'Sa (Play rate 36%, Performance score 10.0 points higher); Mel (Play rate 32%, Performance score 8.2 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Mel; consider running more copies.
— Mind Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 8. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Mel (Play rate 32%, Performance score 26.0 points higher); Diana (Play rate 20%, Performance score 9.0 points higher); Ezreal (Play rate 59%, Performance score 4.7 points higher). Not better in: Kai'Sa, Viktor, LeBlanc, Ornn, Lillia. Play rate is still low in: Diana, Mel; consider running more copies.
Calm
— Calm Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Vex (Play rate 10%, Performance score 7.9 points higher); Irelia (Play rate 9%, Performance score 5.8 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Irelia, Vex; consider running more copies.
— Calm Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 9. Decks running it perform better in 4 of them: Irelia (Play rate 19%, Performance score 19.4 points higher); Vex (Play rate 47%, Performance score 11.5 points higher); Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman (Play rate 87%, Performance score 10.9 points higher); Azir (Play rate 19%, Performance score 8.1 points higher). Not better in: Akali, Ornn, Jax, Lillia, Master Yi, Wuju Master. Play rate is still low in: Azir, Irelia; consider running more copies.
— Calm Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 8. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Ornn (Play rate 77%, Performance score 17.8 points higher); Akali (Play rate 34%, Performance score 11.2 points higher); Master Yi, Wuju Master (Play rate 46%, Performance score 4.4 points higher). Not better in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman, Azir, Irelia, Vex, Lillia. Play rate is still low in: Akali; consider running more copies.
Body
— Body Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 5. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Master Yi, Wuju Master (Play rate 36%, Performance score 4.7 points higher); Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman (Play rate 12%, Performance score 4.5 points higher). Not better in: Fiora, Jayce, Kha'Zix. Play rate is still low in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman; consider running more copies.
— Body Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 6. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Jax (Play rate 40%, Performance score 34.3 points higher); Fiora (Play rate 51%, Performance score 5.6 points higher). Not better in: Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman, Jayce, Master Yi, Wuju Master, Kha'Zix.
— Body Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 1. Decks running it perform better in 1 of them: Master Yi, Wuju Master (Play rate 43%, Performance score 19.3 points higher).
Order
— Order Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 3. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: LeBlanc (Play rate 6%, Performance score 19.3 points higher); Viktor (Play rate 38%, Performance score 11.6 points higher); Rek'Sai (Play rate 55%, Performance score 11.4 points higher). Play rate is still low in: LeBlanc; consider running more copies.
— Order Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 4. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Azir (Play rate 12%, Performance score 30.8 points higher); Kennen (Play rate 58%, Performance score 19.5 points higher); Rek'Sai (Play rate 25%, Performance score 5.0 points higher). Not better in: LeBlanc. Play rate is still low in: Azir, Rek'Sai; consider running more copies.
— Order Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Viktor (Play rate 41%, Performance score 17.2 points higher); LeBlanc (Play rate 10%, Performance score 7.3 points higher). Play rate is still low in: LeBlanc; consider running more copies.
Chaos
— Chaos Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 4. Decks running it perform better in 3 of them: Vex (Play rate 89%, Performance score 20.9 points higher); Kha'Zix (Play rate 26%, Performance score 13.8 points higher); Kennen (Play rate 83%, Performance score 5.9 points higher). Not better in: Irelia. Play rate is still low in: Kha'Zix; consider running more copies.
— Chaos Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Kennen (Play rate 86%, Performance score 25.1 points higher); Kha'Zix (Play rate 36%, Performance score 10.5 points higher).
— Chaos Legends with enough decks both running and not running the card: 2. Decks running it perform better in 2 of them: Kha'Zix (Play rate 28%, Performance score 11.0 points higher); Kennen (Play rate 7%, Performance score 3.6 points higher). Play rate is still low in: Kennen, Kha'Zix; consider running more copies.
Legends
Site data for the last 7 days. Average Conversion rate across all Legends: 0.0%. Meta share = the Legend's decks ÷ all decks; Top cut share = the Legend's top cut finishes ÷ all top cut finishes; Conversion rate = top cut finishes ÷ the Legend's decks.
| Legend | Tier | Meta share | Top cut share | Conversion rate | Wins |
|---|
Tournament winners, Oct 6 – Oct 12
| Tournament | Players | Winner | Legend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Season 4 Chengdu National Open | 1835 | 燐川 | Azir |
| 成都全国公开赛 城市赛特别场A | 128 | Akashic丶剑南春 | Jayce |
| 成都全国公开赛 城市赛特别场B | 128 | MYZ | Lillia |
| City Challenge · Shanghai · 10.07 | 104 | HBG.windman | Rek'Sai |
| 京城大师赛 | 101 | 酷猫-的狗 | Viktor |
| City Challenge · Guangzhou · 10.7 | 83 | 猫岛巡礼-Fexico | Akali |
| City Challenge · Wuhan · 10.06 | 83 | 闪电家.乐事.空心菜 | Ivern |
| City Challenge · Nanjing · 10.06 | 83 | 古一小月 | Master Yi, Wuju Bladesman |
| City Challenge · Shenzhen · 10.6 | 73 | Spike | Kai'Sa |